Simple Machines Blogs > Developers' Blog
RC1 is no longer miles away!
Old Fossil:
--- Quote from: Fustrate on June 28, 2009, 08:29:16 PM ---It's well-known that 2.0 isn't ready for the big time yet. If your site is mission-critical, you should still be using 1.1.9
--- End quote ---
Funny how many sites are using it now and how long has it been around? Several years I was told.
All 3 of the tech staff recommended an upgrade so...
Jade Elizabeth:
--- Quote from: regularexpression on June 28, 2009, 08:14:45 PM ---We don't usually do a dashed version.
Eg we do not do RC1-1, RC1-2, RC1-3
--- End quote ---
Exactly. We do RC1.1 or RC1.2 or RC1.3
* Jade Elizabeth hates the dash
Fustrate:
--- Quote from: TheListener on June 28, 2009, 08:31:20 PM ---
--- Quote from: Fustrate on June 28, 2009, 08:29:16 PM ---It's well-known that 2.0 isn't ready for the big time yet. If your site is mission-critical, you should still be using 1.1.9
--- End quote ---
Funny how many sites are using it now and how long has it been around? Several years I was told.
All 3 of the tech staff recommended an upgrade so...
--- End quote ---
They use it because they accept the risks.
--- Quote from: http://download.simplemachines.org/ ---Note: As this is in early beta we do not suggest running SMF 2.0 RC1.1 on a production site.
--- End quote ---
Jade Elizabeth:
Hey now, enough.
metallica48423:
Might I suggest filing Bug Reports on the problems you've experienced. In that way, we can at least take a look at the problems you're having to see if there's something we don't know about.
It would certainly be much more efficient than posting off-color remarks that are more likely to anger someone than help fix any problems that might be legitimate issues. Otherwise, all we know is what we find in testing and what's reported to us. I've personally been using 2.0 since the early alpha stage and have had relatively few problems even from that early stage.
So please, let us know.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version