I am not discussing wedge and will not be discussing wedge here. The owner has asked not to discussed about it here. I have asked about the license only but it is in another post. You may be right on license issue but we should not be penalized simply for mentioning wedge to certain extend.
No one's going to be penalized, it's simply a topic that tends to upset some SMF team members (including Motoko). It's understandable that it does, by the way, considering the issues we had two years ago, some of which were never resolved. We did resolve, though, that we would no longer be a 'hostile' fork and allow SMF to take some of our code if needed and permitted. (Which is definitively a progress compared to the beginning
As for the owner asking to refrain from discussing Wedge -- I'm assuming you mean Pete? (Arantor.)
That's mainly because he's not encouraging the use of sarcasm, which is more likely to happen in a Wedge-centric discussion. Once bit, twice shy. I understand his position. I, myself, do not bother at all if Wedge is discussed here, with the condition that people understand that I don't visit sm.org regularly (actually I only visit when I hear about a problem with us), and as such I can't answer questions.
Heck, I already find it hard to answer questions these days at wedge.org -- after working like a madman for weeks before the private alpha, I had a burnout a couple of days after said release, and cowardly hid under my bed for a week or two. I'm only starting to surface these days and even then, I'm still not ready to release a public alpha right now. (I'm talking for myself -- Pete has taken over for now so he'd know better than I do.
Oh, and yes, Wedge is out... It's just that we're trying to keep the user base small for now, until we're sure it's ready for public consumption. Which it seems to be, according to our users, but there are still a few outstanding bugs I'm working on... (Damn CSS preprocessor!)