Customizing SMF > Modifications and Packages

User Agreement Update

<< < (8/11) > >>

Labradoodle-360:
That'd be 'possible', but it'd take a little bit of reworking.

Jade Elizabeth:
I had to ask cause I was advised to do that as it makes it legally binding LOL.

Labradoodle-360:
It should be legally binding how it is now...

Jade Elizabeth:
Well yes and no. I can't remember how it was explained to me but essentially if it went to court it could be thrown out because "anyone" could have hit the checkbox and because it's not an "active" agreement. If they have to sign suddenly it's very clear who is signing and it's "active" because they actually have to sign it and participate in agreeing.

Arantor:
Correct, in most jurisdictions it is not really that binding, the reason most T&Cs are 'acceptable' via checkbox is because they're done late in the process of an order, when it is beyond reasonable doubt that it is the person who has made the order etc. who is agreeing to consent to the T&Cs.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page