SMF Development > Next SMF Discussion
My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
rimh101:
--- Quote ---I thought my translation would have been enough - essentially the problem is illogic. To 'doff' (remove) a warning you have to issue a negative warning.
--- End quote ---
This way I mean it in order to lift warning for the user it is necessary to click on the minus all the way to result 0, later it is necessary to add anew warning with result 0 the previous warning to be removed, it’s silly because should be a button of doff warning than clicking on the minus.
--- Quote ---There IS a button for cleaning the logs. It's in the maintenance area, under routine tasks. The reason for this is to prevent people who shouldn't be tampering with it from doing so.
--- End quote ---
I understand where exactly this button is?
--- Quote ---Again, why are you insisting on removing these logs? They are kept so you can see the history of troublesome users!
--- End quote ---
I am not insisting, I gave my suggestion as for improving the system of warnings, of course the history of granted warnings should be because it is needed to see what for some user got a warning but the button of cleaning this history should be, I think, if somebody wants it so leave this history for itself, if somebody doesn’t want it so remove it. That's all in this subject.
--- Quote ---Eh, that's a matter of taste, I disliked 1.1.x, 2.0 is better, but not by a lot.
--- End quote ---
Yeah it is a matter of the taste, I hope that of the further development of the SMF 2xx the appearance of the profile will be changing for the better it is about an aesthetic quality and array.
--- Quote ---You didn't really answer my questions. It is likely that it is related to your screen size!
--- End quote ---
1440X900 resolution, field appears to the crooked password and this slider on the right side, as I wrote it is in the Curve style during the registration, this can be seen as use of internet explorer, in the other browser doesn’t have this problem, I checked on other SMF forums along with the style Curve and this problem are appearing on the viewer Internet Explorer, on the Core style doesn't have this problem and it is also knowing style in SMF 2 xx.
I marked on the screen how it is looks in the internet explorer
i47.tinypic.com/dn2crb.png (add http)
--- Quote ---That's the point: it really isn't as good as you seem to think. I have actively been trying this in another forum system and it's actually less intuitive than it sounds like it should be.
--- End quote ---
I understand, ok, if the SMF 2 xx programmers decided that the logging field will not at the bottom, then I will not argue with that.
What I was supposed to report from myself I reported, maybe programmers will look at the system of warnings which must be improved, as for the button of remove warnings, no minus! And it will improve and if it isn't a fault from the resolution it fits to implement corrections to SMF styles for IE 9. I thank for the devoted attention.
emanuele:
Hello rimh101, welcome to sm.org and thank you for the suggestions.
Okay, now I understand the point about "removing warnings", it's not about remove the entry from the log, but "revoke" a warning issued (I honestly think it makes sense to keep record of all the actions related to warnings, both increasing and decreasing it).
It is somehow related to this request: in other words the warning system has already all the needed flexibility (except maybe an easier way to "revoke" a warning like you proposed), but it not perfectly clear how it can be used to people new to this system.
A "revoke" warning could be a simple link in the table next to "points", it would probably need a new template (a reason to revoke the warning would be needed anyway), but it shouldn't be too difficult.
Arantor:
--- Quote ---I understand where exactly this button is?
--- End quote ---
Admin > Maintenance > Forum Maintenance > Routine > Empty out unimportant logs
--- Quote ---because it is needed to see what for some user got a warning but the button of cleaning this history should be, I think, if somebody wants it so leave this history for itself, if somebody doesn’t want it so remove it. That's all in this subject.
--- End quote ---
I still don't see why you need to empty the history out.
--- Quote ---I marked on the screen how it is looks in the internet explorer
--- End quote ---
So really we're talking about a bug in IE rather than anything else... it should work as expected in up to IE8 which is what was released when 2.0 final was released a year ago.
It won't be fixed in 2.0.x but it will hopefully be fixed in 2.1.
rimh101:
--- Quote ---Hello rimh101, welcome to sm.org and thank you for the suggestions.
--- End quote ---
Hi. Thanks. Okay :)
--- Quote ---Okay, now I understand the point about "removing warnings", it's not about remove the entry from the log, but "revoke" a warning issued (I honestly think it makes sense to keep record of all the actions related to warnings, both increasing and decreasing it).
It is somehow related to this request: in other words the warning system has already all the needed flexibility (except maybe an easier way to "revoke" a warning like you proposed), but it not perfectly clear how it can be used to people new to this system.
--- End quote ---
I don't understand this too much, I mean it in order to you as programmers will improve this system of warnings so that there is an option of doff warning for the user through the button doff warning/remove warning anything, and not as now, in order to remove a warning should click into the button on the minus, all the way to result 0 and then it is necessary to add this warning with this result, it doesn't make sense never met with such a system of warnings in which in order to doff a warning must click into the button on the minus on previous warning, I don't blame you for this, but I want to aim you so that you correct this system of warnings, so that you implement what I wrote, it is good.
--- Quote ---A "revoke" warning could be a simple link in the table next to "points", it would probably need a new template (a reason to revoke the warning would be needed anyway), but it shouldn't be too difficult.
--- End quote ---
I understand, it already depends on you programmers as if you did it, important there would be a revoke/doff/remove button of this warnings.
I love SMF and therefore I am wanting what's best for this forum.
--- Quote ---Admin > Maintenance > Forum Maintenance > Routine > Empty out unimportant logs
--- End quote ---
Thanks.
--- Quote ---I still don't see why you need to empty the history out.
--- End quote ---
I will answer this way: if to improve the system of warnings, to improve it of it in all options, not only in one, thats why I suggested the button/option of cleaning it, that's all, now it depends on programmers whether will find it appropriate in order to insert it whether no, I am favour of this, and I don't change the sentence.
--- Quote ---So really we're talking about a bug in IE rather than anything else... it should work as expected in up to IE8 which is what was released when 2.0 final was released a year ago.
--- End quote ---
Yeah but w IE 8 doesn't have this problem with this registration, in IE 9 is (STRANGE).
--- Quote ---It won't be fixed in 2.0.x but it will hopefully be fixed in 2.1.
--- End quote ---
All right, I also have such hope.
emanuele:
Now that I think about it, the problem with the registration template is most likely the usual bug on the recognition of IE 9 (i.e. IE 9 is not recognized by SMF and is considered...IE6? don't remember).
Try this:
http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=455542.msg3254291#msg3254291
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version