Customizing SMF > Mambo Bridge Support
Mambo Bridge FAQ
kai920:
By not including the Joomla template, I see there is less "stuff" in the <head> section, which would lead me to believe SMF would run faster and is more light-weight. Is this correct?
Could you shed light on some "behind the scenes" technicalities and advantages of wrapped vs. unwrapped, besides the obvious aesthetic differences?
--- Quote from: Orstio on September 16, 2007, 12:52:53 PM ---Wrapped: This indicates that the bridge is wrapped within the Mambo template. This is accessed through Mambo.
Unwrapped: This indicates that the bridge is not wrapped in the Mambo template. This is accessed through Mambo. The URL looks exactly the same as the wrapped setting, but the Mambo template is excluded.
--- End quote ---
Orstio:
--- Quote ---By not including the Joomla template, I see there is less "stuff" in the <head> section, which would lead me to believe SMF would run faster and is more light-weight. Is this correct?
--- End quote ---
No. Everything that is loaded in the wrapped version is also loaded i the unwrapped version. The only difference is in the display.
Trulyana:
How do you get the SMF Bridge in the list of components, when you create a link from the menu to my bridge?
I am completetly new to this.
Orstio:
When you install the bridge, it will automatically appear in the list of components.
Alexist:
When I trying to login in my SMF it won't working and it only work in Mambo and Community Builder but the registration of SMF is being redirected to Mambo page.
Updated:
8: Undefined property: stdClass::$login
File: /home/alexist/public_html/components/com_smf/smf.php
Line: 776
appearing when I'm trying to login in SMf
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version