SMF Development > Next SMF Discussion
[3.0] Full UTF8 support
青山 素子:
--- Quote from: Xarcell on October 05, 2011, 01:09:04 PM ---+1
As it was said, a no brainer.
--- End quote ---
It certainly wasn't when SMF 2.0 was being designed. Back then, PHP4 was still widely used (still is in some areas...) and proper Unicode support was difficult to come by without a ton of effort. With the huge move to PHP5 and cleaned up support, it would be silly to not fully support Unicode in a widely-used software.
Dzonny:
+1
It would be easier if new members don't have to deal with charset problems, full utf8 support would fix many possible issues.
Daniel Hofverberg:
Of course it's preferable with full UTF-8 support for those that do want it. However, I do not want to be forced to use UTF-8, as I prefer good old ISO-8859-1.
Nightwish:
--- Quote from: Daniel Hofverberg on October 11, 2011, 03:54:45 AM ---Of course it's preferable with full UTF-8 support for those that do want it. However, I do not want to be forced to use UTF-8, as I prefer good old ISO-8859-1.
--- End quote ---
Bad idea.
Seriously, it's 2011. The web should be UTF-8 only. Period. 7/8bit character sets are a relict of ancient days and should die. They are among the most annoying things a developer has to deal with - Unicode makes things so much easier. Time to move on and forget old habits.
Fustrate:
--- Quote from: Daniel Hofverberg on October 11, 2011, 03:54:45 AM ---Of course it's preferable with full UTF-8 support for those that do want it. However, I do not want to be forced to use UTF-8, as I prefer good old ISO-8859-1.
--- End quote ---
Do you have a reason for preferring it, or do you just not want to change? Honest question.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version