Like system

[青山 素子]

Same with a built in Facebook, Twitter connections, but you must enable it through the Admin Control Panel.

If that's going to be included, it also needs  MySpace, Badoo, Orkut, and LinkedIn.

[Norv]

Same with a built in Facebook, Twitter connections, but you must enable it through the Admin Control Panel.

If that's going to be included, it also needs  MySpace, Badoo, Orkut, and LinkedIn.

And G+ and reddit.


This is a non-issue, mostly, except for, of course, current problems with mod installation: which are being addressed by hooks in 2.0 and 2.1, and plugin system in 3.0. Because, please look at it this way:
1/ - None will be other than a mod for 2.0/2.1.
2/ - What we consider is for SMF 3.0 to offer social plugins, to be found and installed from a delimited area of Package Manager, or a delimited category of the simplemachines customizations site.
It doesn't need to be that different, from being "in admin panel", other than: as much as possible not have issues with direct code modifications, and respectively, easy to find. The latter may welcome a bit of imagination from our designers, to make the area more understandable and easy to use, than browsing through the customizations server is today.

[emanuele]

This seems to be another "duplicate" of a "like", so I'm moving it. Though there are also other things discussed, if any of you think this should stay in feature requests for more discussion feel free to move it back.

[Viaja]

I want a "like system" with no Social Medias..
I need only a like option (and an optional "unlike") and a "like" icon.
And members that liked the post.
Can I find this?

[Arantor]

I believe what you're after is actually a paid mod (because the free one doesn't have all the options), from smfpacks.com

[wdh280]

+1 for a like it system for Smf this post is example for it cuts down on the post saying +1 makes the forums not look tacky.

[markeefarmer]

The free version does not seem to work with latest SMF 2.04. 
Wonder if it will be made to work?

[emanuele]

Works just fine as explained in this post (tested right now).

Also, since this feature is already "accepted" for a future version, I'm locking this topic to avoid duplicates.
Feel free to discuss the feature on the linked topic.