SMF 2.1 RC4 has been released! Try it out and help us test! Read more.
Started by JovanT, August 28, 2006, 05:03:39 PM
Quote from: MostTimeOnline on December 07, 2006, 10:19:26 AMI agree, but then we should have two choices - UTF-8 and ISO xxxx... both Latin and Cyrilic translations..(kao sto rekoh ja imam problem zbog baze pa ne mogu tako lako da se prebacim na UTF-8)(Pedja sa ES-a? )
Quote from: Pedja on December 07, 2006, 01:58:11 AMWhy using ISO-8859-5 instead of UTF-8? What is the gain? When we use UTF-8, we can easily mix all languages on forum.
Quote from: mariopazi on December 07, 2006, 02:15:00 PMi moja je baza foruma na latin_swedish_ci prebacio mi je koding prijatelj @bernard u prevod latinicni srpski za 1.1 RC3 ... i radi ...evo ti link u potpisu pa vidi ako ti odgovara saljem ti prevod
Quote from: Compuart on December 07, 2006, 02:38:06 PMSingle-byte character sets (like ISO-8859-5) do have an advantage over multi-byte character sets in that they use a bit less space and string manipulations can be done faster. As you mentioned, the big advantage of UTF-8 is of course its support for multiple languages, so if you'd need support for multiple languages, UTF-8 is the way to go.
Quote from: MostTimeOnline on December 07, 2006, 04:23:40 PMHm.. ti koristis Western encoding.,.. ja imam dublji problem, a to je cim promenim encoding na nesto sto nije Windows 1250 svi stari postovi pobrljave... kuke i motike, a cirilica jos gore ?!?@%#% ...