Wondering if this will always be free? See why free is better.
Started by Arantor, December 09, 2009, 04:00:36 AM
Quote from: Eyesman on January 23, 2011, 03:11:06 AMI have an smf v.1.1.12 and I have installed this mod but it doesn't work as it should. My child board remail as they were. I'm using the default theme of smf.
Quote from: Arantor on February 03, 2011, 11:15:38 AMFirstly, you linked to a board, which means MessageIndex.template.php is being used not BoardIndex.template.php.
Quote from: Arantor on February 03, 2011, 11:15:38 AMSecondly, that board is behaving exactly as I would expect it to, seeing that it doesn't relay the normal child boards but child boards only, i.e. the child boards of a parent are altered on the front index, and also the child boards of child boards (i.e. when presented as child boards) in the message index. So I would expect nothing to occur in the message index unless some of THOSE had children - which they don't.
Quote from: Arantor on February 03, 2011, 11:15:38 AMThirdly, it doesn't appear to be turned on from the Features and Options panel, so it's not been told to use anything other than the default. You know, the setting I mentioned in the mod description...
Quote from: Arantor on February 03, 2011, 03:01:24 PMYes, that's the message index. But as demonstrated it will only do anything if the boards shown in the message index have child boards themselves. NONE of your boards in the presented link do so, so it does nothing.
Quote from: Shrinath on December 06, 2010, 11:00:14 AMAlso not working with RC4..
<install for="2.0 RC2, 2.0 RC3">
<install for="2.0 RC2, 2.0 RC3, 2.0 RC4, 2.0 RC5">
<uninstall for="2.0 RC2, 2.0 RC3">
<uninstall for="2.0 RC2, 2.0 RC3, 2.0 RC4, 2.0 RC5">
Quote from: Neo_TE on February 16, 2011, 06:49:54 AMReplace With :Code Select Expand<install for="2.0 RC2, 2.0 RC3, 2.0 RC4, 2.0 RC5">
<install for="2.0 RC2 - 2.0 RC5">
Quote from: Arantor on February 16, 2011, 10:01:48 AMBecause they're not treated as numbers. They're discrete blocks.
Quote from: Spoogs on February 28, 2011, 06:59:35 PMgo back 1 page to find a solution