Simple Machines Community Forum

Archived Boards and Threads... => Archived Boards => SMF Feedback and Discussion => Topic started by: madfiddler on September 21, 2003, 09:23:14 PM

Title: Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: madfiddler on September 21, 2003, 09:23:14 PM
Are there any plans to bring out a converter for this or, if I wanted to, would I have to use a Yabb to Simple Machine converter, and loose all the additional features supplied with Supermod?

Thanks,

Mark.
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: David on September 21, 2003, 09:35:13 PM
Supermod would have to be fully rewritten to work with SMF.  There will be a convertor that will allow you to upgrade to SMF but you will lose the Supermod functionality.
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Tyris on September 21, 2003, 10:00:02 PM
worth noting that all the extra tables and extra data will still be there, so you can still choose to mod it with individual mods that take advantage of the data already there. (correct me if I'm wrong there...)
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: David on September 21, 2003, 10:03:53 PM
Quote from: Tyris on September 21, 2003, 10:00:02 PM
worth noting that all the extra tables and extra data will still be there, so you can still choose to mod it with individual mods that take advantage of the data already there. (correct me if I'm wrong there...)
Unknown has said he will develop a convertor that will convert into a clean set of tables.
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Tyris on September 21, 2003, 10:12:42 PM
hmmm... whada u mean by a clean set...? coz shouldn't all the member info remain in the member table etc...? or will it like go to member_extras table or something....?
hmmm... well I cant really say that I care.. most of the stuff in supermod is probably standard now anyway.. and adding new mods by yourself is half the fun ;D
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: [Unknown] on September 21, 2003, 10:45:37 PM
1. Special "Supermod" data NOT part of YaBB SE will not be converted, even if the same feature exists in SMF.  This may change.

2. The current upgrade/conversion script does not remove the old fields or tables added by mods or the Supermod.  I may write a separate converter to do this job, if it is needed.

3. This converter, which I may write, would "remove" any fields or tables from your database that are not part of SMF's known set of fields and tables.

4. The upgrade/conversion script has an option to create a backup of your old tables and data before conversion.

5. ANY EXISTING MODS you have installed WILL NOT carry over, EVEN IF the same feature(s) are/is in SMF.

6. The Supermod Team seems reluctant to cooperate legally with the SMF and YaBB SE team.

7. Mods for YaBB SE can be rewritten, although it may likely take a lot of changing, to work with SMF with their original data.

-[Unknown]
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Tyris on September 21, 2003, 10:52:23 PM
ok, cool... thanx for that.
cleared quite a few things up ^_^
I guess the modding community will have a lot of fun jobs rewriting mods for SMF :D joy!!
we're allowed to 'port' other peoples mods so long as we use entirely our own code right? (ie: port the idea not the actual mod) legally..?
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: [Unknown] on September 22, 2003, 02:17:24 AM
Unless they patented it, (highly unlikely) yes.

-[Unknown]
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Tyris on September 22, 2003, 02:36:38 AM
lol, ok cool. (has -anyone- ever patented a YaBB mod...? or any forum for that matter...? and does it still count if its a mod for a different forum ;))
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Jack.R.Abbit™ on September 22, 2003, 02:57:42 AM
Out of respect for the original mod writer (and perhaps to avoid confusion over multiple mods that do the same thing), one might want to check with them to see if they plan to port their own mod before running off and rewriting it yourself.  I believe it would be a simple courtesy that one would likely expect if the roles were reversed.
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Seph|roth on September 22, 2003, 02:58:28 AM
Quote from: [Unknown] on September 22, 2003, 02:17:24 AM
Unless they patented it, (highly unlikely) yes.

-[Unknown]
offtopic: well, here in Europe it's not that unlikely anymore ... http://swpat.ffii.org/
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Tyris on September 22, 2003, 03:10:29 AM
@JackRabbit - fair enough, I agree I'd like the same respect if someone where to port one of my mods (of course I don't have any public ones.. but you know what I mean).

patenting is dodgy.. I mean the way things are going... you could probably patent the use of str_replace as a means of replacing bbcode with html equivilents... and so on and so forth... it just gets stupid.
People should be able to write their own code from scratch to do whatever they want so long as they dont copy code.
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Fizzy on October 09, 2003, 08:39:24 AM
Quote from: [Unknown] on September 21, 2003, 10:45:37 PM
3. This converter, which I may write, would "remove" any fields or tables from your database that are not part of SMF's known set of fields and tables.
-[Unknown]

Hi ,

This bit has got me popping out kittens :o

Can I clarify this point. Are you saying that anything in a MySQL database that is not SMF related will get "removed" ?
I have a lot more than just yabbse running from my MySQL database with obviously different table names, eg table = links_members, links_category, list_banned etc etc

Would those tables get destroyed by using an SMF convertor?
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: [Unknown] on October 09, 2003, 09:17:29 AM
No, the iea is only for tables... and this converter IS SEPARATE.  How many times must I say this?

It is unlikely this converter, which I MAY write, will come out even the week of the release of SMF.  There are NO PLANS to include it with SMF for any reason, shape, or form.  It woukld ONLY be for MAINTENANCE cleaning of your tables, IF YOU WANTED TO DO SO.

It would have NOTHING to do with Supermod OR YaBB SE.  It would "convert" ONLY SMF to SMF.

-[Unknown]
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Tyris on October 09, 2003, 09:18:13 AM
I dunno if he really means all non-related tables too...
but fear not, the main converter which is already written copies over ALL relevant YaBBSE --> SMF fields and tables, and just leaves any additional fields where they were, so it wont damage any of your own tables.

*edit* [Unknown] beat me ;D
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Fizzy on October 09, 2003, 12:59:03 PM
Jeez  :-X

Talk about getting my head bitten off for asking a civil question  :-\

Tyris, thanks for clarifying that for me.
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: [Unknown] on October 09, 2003, 01:04:28 PM
Sorry, but I kept saying that.  I tried to make it CLEAR that it's SEPARATE.  Why does no one understand?  What am I saying that makes this point so cryptic and vague?

It's not you, Fizzy, it's saying the same thing over and over.  I have a little brother and can't stand it any more.

-[Unknown]
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Fizzy on October 09, 2003, 04:29:53 PM
Hey that's cool

I haven't even a clue how much pressure you guys must be under to get this released.
It's not that you don't explain yourself because you do, it's that some of us aren't as familiar with the terminolgy or language that you use as second nature so we need a bit of nurse maiding.

Please try and bear with us .
Don't doubt that you're not doing well, we know that the whole team is working its socks off. Just please try and bear with us when it comes to explaining things, we're not as quick on taking up what you are saying, that doesn't make it your fault buddy by any means , it just takes a bit of time to get things clear in a thick old skull like mine ;)

Thanks for being understanding :) And thanks for all the hard work. Alpha SMF has already proved that.
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: [Unknown] on October 09, 2003, 04:41:58 PM
No, it's my fault.  I always phrase things exactly the wrong way.  Even this sentence code easily be better put by practically anyone else on this forum.

Maybe it's also related to my being awake for the past about 26 hours... I need to stop doing this, not to mention screwing my schedule so royally.

But, nah, it wasn't actually that bad.... I'm just on a short leesh.

-[Unknown]
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Fizzy on October 09, 2003, 05:31:30 PM
Well it's cool with me regardless

You shouldn't bust yourself up like that. I'm sure there isn't a member here that wouldn't mind waiting an extra week or two rather than to see you doing yourself in like that.

I for one appreciate all the efforts you are putting in on SMF.

Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Tyris on October 09, 2003, 08:43:31 PM
heh, I think its probably coz [Unknown] has tried to explain it in numerous topics so far... and that can get really annoying.

I personally dont find it cryptic and vaigue... but I learn php and stuff too :-\ and have read it a few times too ^_^

keep up the good work though all ^_^
Title: Re:Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Acf on October 10, 2003, 10:11:55 AM
Quote from: [Unknown] on October 09, 2003, 04:41:58 PM
No, it's my fault.  I always phrase things exactly the wrong way.  Even this sentence code easily be better put by practically anyone else on this forum.

Maybe it's also related to my being awake for the past about 26 hours... I need to stop doing this, not to mention screwing my schedule so royally.

But, nah, it wasn't actually that bad.... I'm just on a short leesh.

-[Unknown]

(http://www.johnrwood.com/graphics/home_woody_woody.gif) Get some sleep.....  ;)
Title: Re: Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: esrefb on July 29, 2004, 03:48:43 PM
Hello, I found this topic going back to September 2003.  Could you inform me about the current situation?  Is there any new progress about upgrading from Supermod to SMF?  I hope there is.

Thank you.
Title: Re: Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: andrea on July 29, 2004, 04:06:39 PM
Please read here:
http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=2314.0
Title: Re: Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: tinfoilhat on December 26, 2006, 05:38:15 PM
Hello,
       I just wanted to be clear which converter I should use to convert a supermod forum to a simple machines forum.  I did not see a supermod converter in the converter page.  http://www.simplemachines.org/download/?converters (http://www.simplemachines.org/download/?converters).  I do see a YaBBSE converter.  Is this the one I should use?  Thank you for your help.
Title: Re: Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Grudge on December 26, 2006, 06:23:01 PM
Try the YaBBSE converter and if you have any problems let us know. At worst it won't work - it certainly won't destroy your current install :)
Title: Re: Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: tinfoilhat on December 26, 2006, 07:46:43 PM
Quote from: Grudge on December 26, 2006, 06:23:01 PM
Try the YaBBSE converter and if you have any problems let us know. At worst it won't work - it certainly won't destroy your current install :)
Thank you for the quick reply. 
Title: Re: Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: madfiddler on December 26, 2006, 08:06:10 PM
I did a convert from supermod to smf a few years ago. Obviously, I don't know what's been added to Supermod during that time... but I've not looked back.
Title: Re: Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: Ben_S on December 26, 2006, 08:12:41 PM
The answer is probably nothing... ;)
Title: Re: Supermod to Simple Machines
Post by: tinfoilhat on January 18, 2007, 10:24:14 PM
Hello,
           I have tried the converter and on the first run it gives this error:

Converting members... Unsuccessful!
This query:

    UPDATE `smf`.smf_members
    SET im_ignore_list = ''
    WHERE ID_MEMBER = 29
    LIMIT 1;

Caused the error:

    Unknown column 'im_ignore_list' in 'field list'

Any ideas?  I suspect that supermod has extra columns that is throwing off the converter.