Simple Machines Community Forum

General Community => Site Comments, Issues and Concerns => Topic started by: Burpee on September 21, 2004, 05:41:30 PM

Title: This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Post by: Burpee on September 21, 2004, 05:41:30 PM
Try clicking on the valid XHTML 1.0 button at the button when there's a flash banner on top... The flash banner from Rochen doesn't seem to validate...
Title: Re: This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Post by: Cypher7 on September 21, 2004, 05:46:12 PM
QuoteThe document located at <http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=16952.0;topicseen> was checked and found to be valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional.

QuoteW3C CSS Validator Results for http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=16952.0;topicseen

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No error or warning found
Congratulations!
This document validates as CSS!

!?!?
Title: Re: This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Post by: Burpee on September 21, 2004, 05:57:59 PM
Sry Cypher, messed up the post and corrected it :P
Title: Re: This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Post by: Burpee on September 21, 2004, 06:25:08 PM
Okay... and for some reason it doesn't always give the error either so I'm just copy-pasting it here and giving it some makeup :P

   1.      Line 28, column 93: end tag for "param" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified
      .../tmp/rochen-banner-468x60-flash.swf">

      You may have neglected to close a tag, or perhaps you meant to "self-close" a tag; that is, ending it with "/>" instead of ">".

   2.      Line 28, column 4: start tag was here

      <param name="movie" value="http://www.rochenhost.com/tmp/rochen-banner-468x6


   3.      Line 29, column 39: end tag for "param" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified
      <param name="quality" value="High">

    4.      Line 29, column 4: start tag was here

      <param name="quality" value="High">

   5.      Line 30, column 15: there is no attribute "src"
      <embed src="http://www.rochenhost.com/tmp/rochen-banner-468x60-flash.swf" pl

      You have used the attribute named above in your document, but the document type you are using does not support that attribute for this element. This error is often caused by incorrect use of the "Strict" document type with a document that uses frames (e.g. you must use the "Transitional" document type to get the "target" attribute), or by using vendor proprietary extensions such as "marginheight" (this is usually fixed by using CSS to achieve the desired effect instead).

      This error may also result if the element itself is not supported in the document type you are using, as an undefined element will have no supported attributes; in this case, see the element-undefined error message for further information.

      How to fix: check the spelling and case of the element and attribute, (Remember XHTML is all lower-case) and/or check that they are both allowed in the chosen document type, and/or use CSS instead of this attribute.


   6.      Line 30, column 90: there is no attribute "pluginspage"
      ...banner-468x60-flash.swf" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashpl

   7.      Line 30, column 141: there is no attribute "type"
      ...cromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" name="ob

   8.      Line 30, column 178: there is no attribute "name"
      ..."application/x-shockwave-flash" name="obj1" quality="High" width="468" height

   9.      Line 30, column 193: there is no attribute "quality"
      ...shockwave-flash" name="obj1" quality="High" width="468" height="60"></object>

  10.      Line 30, column 206: there is no attribute "width"
      ...sh" name="obj1" quality="High" width="468" height="60"></object><div id="beac

  11.      Line 30, column 219: there is no attribute "height"
      ...1" quality="High" width="468" height="60"></object><div id="beacon_11" style=

  12.      Line 30, column 223: element "embed" undefined

      ...uality="High" width="468" height="60"></object><div id="beacon_11" style="pos

      You have used the element named above in your document, but the document type you are using does not define an element of that name. This error is often caused by incorrect use of the "Strict" document type with a document that uses frames (e.g. you must use the "Frameset" document type to get the "<frameset>" element), or by using vendor proprietary extensions such as "<spacer>" or "<marquee>" (this is usually fixed by using CSS to achieve the desired effect instead).

  13.      Line 30, column 232: end tag for "embed" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified
      ...igh" width="468" height="60"></object><div id="beacon_11" style="position: ab

  14.      Line 30, column 4: start tag was here
      <embed src="http://www.rochenhost.com/tmp/rochen-banner-468x60-flash.swf" pl
Title: Re: This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Post by: A.M.A on September 21, 2004, 06:54:37 PM
Flash does not validate as far as I know .. unless you use this method (http://alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay/) and I've read somewhere that it is not perfect and got some problems.
Title: Re: This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Post by: [Unknown] on September 21, 2004, 11:54:40 PM
The advertisement usually doesn't validate.

-[Unknown]
Title: Re: This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Post by: Burpee on September 22, 2004, 04:12:32 AM
Hmm... didn't know that Flash wasn't xhtml compatible... W3C doesn't make it easy for us does it?
Title: Re: This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Post by: Oldiesmann on September 22, 2004, 10:23:55 AM
I think the "proper" method is using the object tag, but that's annoying because you have to know the proper class ID for that.
Title: Re: This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Post by: Louis (CSpotkill) on September 22, 2004, 12:46:13 PM
Quote from: A.M.A on September 21, 2004, 06:54:37 PM
Flash does not validate as far as I know .. unless you use this method (http://alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay/) and I've read somewhere that it is not perfect and got some problems.

Two possible fixes for problems people had with Flash Satay:

http://www.stilldreamer.com/programming/a_list_aparts_flash_satay_method_improved/
http://meddle.dzygn.com/tests/lanzadera/english.php

I've never had Flash Satay fail on me, personally ...

By the way, the Flash Satay method is also on Macromedia's website: http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/dreamweaver/articles/flash_satay.html