Core features was not saved

[Akyhne]

I was going to repport an error in an upgraded SMF RC1 forum (from Beta 4). As this one was running Danish, I went to a test forum I have, also just upgraded to RC1 from beta 4.

The error was in the "logs", so I went there. But only "Error Log" and maybe a few more (I don't remember) was shown. As that forum is a test forum, I remembered to have enabled all options in "Core features". I went there, and all otptions were enabled.

So I just went ahead and clicked "Save". Now everything seems ok.

Is this a known bug? I'm wondering if I now have to go through all settings and click "Save" to make sure everything is as expected!

[H]

This may be a bug.

Does your forum have any modifications or theme changes?
If you can reproduce the problem, the error from the log would be the very helpful for the developers

[Akyhne]

I only have SMG, AEVA and Avatar Verification installed. I run Default theme.

Edit: and there's no errors in the log.

[Akyhne]

Sorry, it's Babylon I run, but still I made no changes to the theme.

[karlbenson]

IIRC, it says them all as one string
theres a letter for each item like k,v,l,p

I can't see why it wouldn't be saved except a session verification error or something.

Checked the svn, I can save it etc no problem.

Could it be a browser cache thing I wonder?

[Akyhne]

In what way? All settings were enabled in "Core Features" before updating to RC1 a few days ago. I didn't change anything, except installing RC1.
I just tried the same thing in another test forum. I had no issues there. So maybe it was a bug in the Beta 4, but still when you enter a RC1 forum and settings says "Moderation, Administration and User Logs" is activated in "Core Features", it should show up.
And I know for ceartain that all the log options has been shown at some point before upgrading. Like I said, this is a test forum, so I tried all the options out to see how they worked and tested my Danish translation to see if it made any sense.

[karlbenson]

very strange indeed.

[Akyhne]

very strange indeed.

Strange indeed. It was actually the ONLY of all my 1.1.x and 2.0.x forums where I didn't have trouble upgrading.

[karlbenson]

I just grabbed a copy of 2.0 beta 4, and then ran a comparison between beta 4 and rc1.

There are several changes around the source files which deal with the core features.
including loading an extra sub template, requiring an extra file and running an extra function.

Not sure whether any of them could cause the issue.