Follow SMF on Twitter.
Didn't worked on 2 of my sites. SMF 2.0.17
haha... Sorry, you're right.I installed without problem, all fine and no errors. When I tested the AMP under search console, said: NO AMP DETECTED.That's all... Maybe I am doing something wrong (IDK)Thanks a lot for your quick reply
<link rel="amphtml" href="https://www.yoursite.tld/index.php?action=amp;topic=id">
<a href="" onclick="return smfSelectText(this);" class="codeoperation">[Select]</a></div><code class="bbc_code">SET xdate = %date: ~ -10,2%% date: ~ -7,2%% date: ~ -4,4%</code><br /><div class="codeheader">Código: (Windows) <a href="" onclick="return smfSelectText(this);" class="codeoperation">[Seleccionar]</a></div><code class="bbc_code">@echo on<br />
It works as it should although I thought it causes problems with the nice url, so far it works fine. But when there are citations or the code bbcode fails in the validation, not everywhere but in some specific points related to php (I have to do more tests). Left where that error marks me:Quote<a href="" onclick="return smfSelectText(this);" class="codeoperation">[Select]</a></div><code class="bbc_code">SET xdate = %date: ~ -10,2%% date: ~ -7,2%% date: ~ -4,4%</code><br /><div class="codeheader">Código: (Windows) <a href="" onclick="return smfSelectText(this);" class="codeoperation">[Seleccionar]</a></div><code class="bbc_code">@echo on<br />Try one 2.0.15 and two 2.0.17... In all of them something similar happens to me when I put [code][/code] with lines in php/bach/bash (I have to try more).Regards!ADD: Apparently the error occurs because the "onclick" attribute cannot appear in the "a" tag (it's an AMP rule from what I read). It's time to do a little more research!
I only have this error on topics with image from the RSS Feed Poster. (I use this mod) AMP validator: "The tag 'img' may only appear as a descendant of tag 'noscript'. Did you mean 'amp-img'? Debug. Learn more..." Remaining OK!
I did not even think about editing topics for this error, I will look for another solution if it exists, although the impression that smf already brings cannot be used? Isn't it similar in the sense it has to be as simple as possible?https://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?action=printpage;topic=574227.0 < It is even more direct than AMP or so it seems to me.Regards!
Yes but it doesn't use the magical markup that Google tells you to use, so it can better make money out of your content.
The system is built based on printpage to keep the simplicity, the reality is AMP is a horrid spawn of Google... The only reason I wrote this mod because a) it was relatively easy to do b) I had time. Solution to BBCode may not be simple, I need to make some research because I honestly think, someone shouldn't just hook-into parseBBC and replace BBCodes with other ones...Another reality is... ResponsiveCurve is 100000000000000 (0 to infinity) better than AMP can ever be, because Responsive design does not limit your functionality UNLIKE this horrid spawn of Google... The mod will become obsolete, once Google says, "okay I' f'd up... this system is not working" -which is relatively soon- because we know that they are removing limitation of promoting sites (to upper story parts) to AMP.
