Topic: SMF 1.1.13, SMF 2.0 RC4 Security Patch, and SMF 2.0 Release Candidate 5

[NanoSector]

Exactly. The team is doing it's best to get Final out as soon as possible. Someone on UBB said once "I prefer a slow, but good development rather than a rapid, bugfull development". So it's your choise: what do you prefer?

The first public beta for 2.0 was in 2008, I prefer a little faster.

* Yoshi2889 makes a face as if he wants to say: Stuuuuuuuuupid

You like buggy software? Go for it.

[kat]

But while the SMF director do nothing to acquire  new developer, the final is long away...
My 2 cent...

If we had God, himself, developing SMF, IT CAN'T BE RELEASED UNTIL THE TRANSFER IS COMPLETE!!!!

Sheesh...

[joey791]

Exactly. The team is doing it's best to get Final out as soon as possible. Someone on UBB said once "I prefer a slow, but good development rather than a rapid, bugfull development". So it's your choise: what do you prefer?

The first public beta for 2.0 was in 2008, I prefer a little faster.

* Yoshi2889 makes a face as if he wants to say: Stuuuuuuuuupid

You like buggy software? Go for it.

Wow name calling, thats mature

[青山 素子]

The problem here is that the current team behind SMF has pinned the release date on the transfer of assets to a different corporation (instead of, ya know, releasing it under the old corporation for now...) and a changed license under the new corporation (instead of using the existing, though flawed, license for one more release). One of the signers of the transfer documents is currently involved in a house move (at least, that's what was said earlier here) and can't sign the paperwork until after the move.

It's kinda difficult to place a date and time when the release of 2.0 final is dependent on both people that do this as a hobby, and the back-and-forth of legal things.

[SleePy]

Thank you for your responses, kudos and comments.  If you need support for SMF, please locate the appropriate support board to do so.