Advertisement:

Author Topic: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX  (Read 31607 times)

Offline jsx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
  • Gender: Male
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #20 on: July 06, 2012, 11:25:18 AM »
Quote
That is already there: admin > configuration > features and options > general: Enable buddy/ignore lists

Indeed this option is, I overlooked it. Thanks for the information.

emanuele I've a question for you explain me why fields to the password during the registration have different colour than the field to the login (white colour)

Offline emanuele

  • SMF Super Hero
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,156
  • Gender: Male
  • THERE'S JUST ME
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #21 on: July 06, 2012, 11:32:42 AM »
The only fields with different color in the registration page are the password fields.
They are different...don't know the reason, I assume to better inform the user if the password is correct or not.


Take a peek at what I'm doing! ;D



Hai bisogno di supporto in Italiano?

Aiutateci ad aiutarvi: spiegate bene il vostro problema: no, "non funziona" non è una spiegazione!!
1) Cosa fai,
2) cosa ti aspetti,
3) cosa ottieni.

Offline jsx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
  • Gender: Male
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #22 on: July 07, 2012, 05:31:58 AM »
Quote
The only fields with different color in the registration page are the password fields.
They are different...don't know the reason, I assume to better inform the user if the password is correct or not.

I know, I understand, essentially should be white field to the password and if writing too short password or repetition of other passwords then this field should change it to the light red colour (if it is red) and then on green (if the password is correct). This is my opinion, as I see it, not necessarily somebody else must see it as I.

And I have another question to you emanuele:

I mean about this option: Allow to show the address email. Description of the option:

If this option is included addresses email of users instead of to be concealed for members of groups and guests will be visible publicly on the forum...

So I ask if this option isn't included so a e-mail in profile e.g. of Administrator, Moderator, User in the group e.g. Vip of the Forum, the e-mail of Users isn't visible for someone who visit profile? I mean that I don't want to other user in group or without group after the entry for someone profile had a preview of the e-mail of the user.

Offline live627

  • SMF Friend
  • SMF Hero
  • *
  • Posts: 5,265
  • Gender: Male
  • Cat: Destroy!
    • live627 on Facebook
    • live627 on GitHub
    • live627 on LinkedIn
    • @live627 on Twitter
    • livemods
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #23 on: July 07, 2012, 07:29:26 PM »
Quote
The only fields with different color in the registration page are the password fields
Don't forget the username, too...

Quote
They are different...don't know the reason, I assume to better inform the user if the password is correct or not.
Indeed. Red of not acceptable, green if it's okay.

Quote
if writing too short password or repetition of other passwords then this field should change it to the light red colour
It stays red if pass is  too short.

Quote
I mean about this option: Allow to show the address email. Description of the option:

If this option is included addresses email of users instead of to be concealed for members of groups and guests will be visible publicly on the forum...

So I ask if this option isn't included
In 2.0.2 it is a  bit different to 1.1.x; it is renamed to "Allow users to email me?" and it is unchecked by default.
Try not to become a man of success, but rather try to become a man of value.
- Albert Einstein

Offline jsx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
  • Gender: Male
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #24 on: July 08, 2012, 09:26:38 AM »
Quote
It stays red if pass is  too short.

I write one more time, currently now the field of the password during the registration is red and shouldn’t be white? The same as field to the login. So if it would be field for password white then if someone write too short password or in repeating the password other password than higher then this field should change to the colour red informing that the password is too short or bad repeated. It’s the same when the password is correct, that is if somebody writes correct password field is changing on green. Now currently field to the password is red and I don’t understand why is red, should be white as the field on login.

Quote
In 2.0.2 it is a  bit different to 1.1.x; it is renamed to "Allow users to email me?" and it is unchecked by default.

As for the option nobody wouldn't see e-mails of users after going the profile of users, I asked if the not turn on this option will lead to that nobody these e-mails will not be seen, so if some usual user or in the group after going the someone profile will see e-mail address or not?

MrPhil

  • Guest
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #25 on: July 08, 2012, 10:04:57 AM »
Indeed. Red of not acceptable, green if it's okay.

Quote
if writing too short password or repetition of other passwords then this field should change it to the light red colour
It stays red if pass is  too short.

Keep in mind that colors alone are absolutely unacceptable to indicate an error or any other status. People with color perception difficulties often will not notice the change in color, or fail to appreciate what it's trying to say. You MUST have something additional, such as a message or symbol, to flag the problem. For severe errors (hopefully a rare event), even blinking might work (it's something you should minimize in an interface).

Notice that even traffic lights do this: red is always at one specific end, and green at the other (note that this positioning varies from state to state!). That's why you don't see a single light that changes between green and yellow and red, although it could technically be done.

Offline jsx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
  • Gender: Male
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #26 on: July 09, 2012, 11:51:54 AM »
My new suggestion as to introduce a new option to the SMF 2xx

Please add the option: hide the address email? – in configuration of profile. As it is in the SMF 1.1xx

Offline Arantor

  • Resident Overthinker
  • SMF Friend
  • SMF Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 68,065
    • Arantor on GitHub
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #27 on: July 09, 2012, 11:56:33 AM »
It's already there, but switched slightly.

SMF 1.x assumed that people would be sharing by default, 2.0 does not but instead assumes people are hidden by default and you have to turn it on to show it, see Profile > Account Settings > Allow users to email me

But it will then take users to a form to send an email instead of actually sharing the user's email with you... all round a better solution.
To assume is to hope that those who came before had the presence of mind and capacity to implement the dreams of those who would come after.

You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain. It seems you have chosen which, and now I must do the same.

Offline emanuele

  • SMF Super Hero
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,156
  • Gender: Male
  • THERE'S JUST ME
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #28 on: July 09, 2012, 03:14:55 PM »
And I have another question to you emanuele:

I mean about this option: Allow to show the address email. Description of the option:

If this option is included addresses email of users instead of to be concealed for members of groups and guests will be visible publicly on the forum...

So I ask if this option isn't included so a e-mail in profile e.g. of Administrator, Moderator, User in the group e.g. Vip of the Forum, the e-mail of Users isn't visible for someone who visit profile? I mean that I don't want to other user in group or without group after the entry for someone profile had a preview of the e-mail of the user.
Not sure what you are asking here: simply don't check this box and the users (apart those with the "manage members" (in normal conditions admins) permission I think) will not be able to directly see any email address.


Take a peek at what I'm doing! ;D



Hai bisogno di supporto in Italiano?

Aiutateci ad aiutarvi: spiegate bene il vostro problema: no, "non funziona" non è una spiegazione!!
1) Cosa fai,
2) cosa ti aspetti,
3) cosa ottieni.

Offline jsx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
  • Gender: Male
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #29 on: July 10, 2012, 04:40:15 AM »
It's already there, but switched slightly.

SMF 1.x assumed that people would be sharing by default, 2.0 does not but instead assumes people are hidden by default and you have to turn it on to show it, see Profile > Account Settings > Allow users to email me

But it will then take users to a form to send an email instead of actually sharing the user's email with you... all round a better solution.

I understand, but I mean the option of to hide the email address for each user. I mean that there is an option hide the e-mail address which no user after going the profile of some user can't see his e-mail address.

And I have another question to you emanuele:

I mean about this option: Allow to show the address email. Description of the option:

If this option is included addresses email of users instead of to be concealed for members of groups and guests will be visible publicly on the forum...

So I ask if this option isn't included so a e-mail in profile e.g. of Administrator, Moderator, User in the group e.g. Vip of the Forum, the e-mail of Users isn't visible for someone who visit profile? I mean that I don't want to other user in group or without group after the entry for someone profile had a preview of the e-mail of the user.
Not sure what you are asking here: simply don't check this box and the users (apart those with the "manage members" (in normal conditions admins) permission I think) will not be able to directly see any email address.

I mean to be introduce option in the panel the administrator which is hiding e-mail addresses for all people on the forum: guests, users, users in groups, apart from of course the Administrator and the Moderator, the point is that no user can’t see publicly address e-mail  let's assume my as administrator or there some other user.

Offline emanuele

  • SMF Super Hero
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,156
  • Gender: Male
  • THERE'S JUST ME
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #30 on: July 10, 2012, 05:14:17 AM »
By default in SMF 2.0 the emails are not visible to anyone apart from administrators.
I'm still not sure how this is different from what you have asked before.


Take a peek at what I'm doing! ;D



Hai bisogno di supporto in Italiano?

Aiutateci ad aiutarvi: spiegate bene il vostro problema: no, "non funziona" non è una spiegazione!!
1) Cosa fai,
2) cosa ti aspetti,
3) cosa ottieni.

Offline Kindred

  • The Mean One
  • Support Specialist
  • SMF Legend
  • *
  • Posts: 55,122
  • Gender: Male
    • Kindred-999 on GitHub
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #31 on: July 10, 2012, 07:49:04 AM »
For example, on this very forum....

you won't see anyone's email address....   even if they have chosen to allow other users to email them, you don't get to SEE the email address, it just triggers a form, which is then sent to the user.
Please do not PM, IM or Email me with support questions.  You will get better and faster responses in the support boards.  Thank you.

Offline jsx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
  • Gender: Male
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #32 on: July 10, 2012, 01:37:26 PM »
By default in SMF 2.0 the emails are not visible to anyone apart from administrators.
I'm still not sure how this is different from what you have asked before.

Super, this is what I wanted to know, thanks for answer.

For example, on this very forum....

you won't see anyone's email address....   even if they have chosen to allow other users to email them, you don't get to SEE the email address, it just triggers a form, which is then sent to the user.

I understand, thanks for information.

Offline jsx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
  • Gender: Male
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #33 on: July 14, 2012, 09:19:23 AM »
I have such a suggestion as for SMF 2xx, let's assume is the thread and in this thread is bad title assume Alicee has a cat and in this thread are added answers from users and to change the name of the thread on correct at the author  ought to editing this thread and correct the title on Alice has a cat, but still at the users who added the answers is seen the bad title as answer on Alicee has cat, so at them ought to editing their message, I propose to introduce such a function that will be allow the change at everyone, if at the author of the thread improve the title at everyone automatically a title should improve. (If this option is possible).

Offline emanuele

  • SMF Super Hero
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,156
  • Gender: Male
  • THERE'S JUST ME
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #34 on: July 14, 2012, 09:24:03 AM »
http://custom.simplemachines.org/mods/index.php?mod=3167

;)

Also, please open a different topic for each request, otherwise it would become difficult to properly track and evaluate everything.


Take a peek at what I'm doing! ;D



Hai bisogno di supporto in Italiano?

Aiutateci ad aiutarvi: spiegate bene il vostro problema: no, "non funziona" non è una spiegazione!!
1) Cosa fai,
2) cosa ti aspetti,
3) cosa ottieni.

Offline jsx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
  • Gender: Male
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #35 on: July 15, 2012, 03:51:58 AM »
I understand, I must to every my new suggestion create the new thread? I can't write in this current?

As for it plug-in, is a possibility such an option with editing of this thread will be available in SMF 2.1? Option which for itself it will be possible to turn on or turn off

Offline emanuele

  • SMF Super Hero
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,156
  • Gender: Male
  • THERE'S JUST ME
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #36 on: July 15, 2012, 05:37:08 AM »
I understand, I must to every my new suggestion create the new thread? I can't write in this current?
Yes, it's better to have one request, one topic.

As for it plug-in, is a possibility such an option with editing of this thread will be available in SMF 2.1? Option which for itself it will be possible to turn on or turn off
No, I don't think it will be in 2.1.


Take a peek at what I'm doing! ;D



Hai bisogno di supporto in Italiano?

Aiutateci ad aiutarvi: spiegate bene il vostro problema: no, "non funziona" non è una spiegazione!!
1) Cosa fai,
2) cosa ti aspetti,
3) cosa ottieni.

Offline jsx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
  • Gender: Male
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #37 on: July 15, 2012, 06:47:50 AM »
I understand, but think about such a function in SMF 2xx sometime, thank you for the information.

Offline jsx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
  • Gender: Male
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #38 on: July 18, 2012, 03:21:27 AM »
emanuele I have a question in relation to this modification which you gave to me in the link to the change of name of the subject after the click to the button RENAME TOPIC appearing a table for the change of name of the subject, only this table has some mistake, I marked it on the screen:
i47.tinypic.com/2ngae6p.jpg
with red arrows, next the Rename Topic inscription isn't showing the picture probably as well as under the Topic Subject inscription is long white field of which it should not be. I install TopicRenamer_2.2 on SMF 2.0.2, you know why such a mistake is appearing? Maybe report it to the author of this modification?

Offline emanuele

  • SMF Super Hero
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,156
  • Gender: Male
  • THERE'S JUST ME
Re: My suggestions for leading into SMF 2XX
« Reply #39 on: July 18, 2012, 05:41:45 AM »
No idea.
Please ask in the support topic for the mod.


Take a peek at what I'm doing! ;D



Hai bisogno di supporto in Italiano?

Aiutateci ad aiutarvi: spiegate bene il vostro problema: no, "non funziona" non è una spiegazione!!
1) Cosa fai,
2) cosa ti aspetti,
3) cosa ottieni.