Read the blogs!
Started by emanuele, September 02, 2012, 04:39:44 PM
QuoteAlso, why would you want to offer support for old versions? stick to the current ones, this also help to encourage people to upgrade to a better version.
Quote from: SoLoGHoST on December 23, 2012, 10:39:15 PMI don't wish to support older versions of the SMF software at all. The problem is, that SMF is always undergoing development to the point where a newer version keeps coming out.
Quote from: SoLoGHoST on December 25, 2012, 03:33:03 AMActually not really... I understand that the internet is an ever-changing environment.
Quote from: SoLoGHoST on December 25, 2012, 03:33:03 AMBut if you build something right the first time, why keep making changes to it? If so, than all that means is that you didn't build it right.
Quote from: emanuele on December 25, 2012, 06:43:17 AMSMF works less perfectly for what modders want to do: whatever they want.That's something known (at least I know it, learned by myself trying to fool the system to let it do what I wanted it to do). Though it's not something easy to change without a "revolution".
Quote from: maxg on December 25, 2012, 11:01:47 AMCool,Thanks and I think I may do that!regards,Maxx
Quote from: SoLoGHoST on December 25, 2012, 09:52:07 PMThe SMCore Project is going to be a "revolution" though and seems that you are going for SMF backwards compatible.
Quote from: SoLoGHoST on December 25, 2012, 09:52:07 PMAnd yes, I understand that SMCore is not SMF. But with the use of hooks, and SMCore together, you'll seem to achieve just this. Hopefully, once SMCore is finished, SMF can just relax and be done with it's development (once it is finalized), and perhaps the Developers could all take a break and/or even work on other extensions for SMCore. But that probably will never happen.