• Welcome to Simple Machines Community Forum. Please login or sign up.
October 24, 2021, 02:24:37 PM

News:

Wondering if this will always be free?  See why free is better.


Global SMF social network

Started by sangham.net, February 26, 2013, 03:24:51 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

sangham.net



It's just a leave it open, make it possible, join-adventure, create real SMF community and more idea which of course would give SMF a huge different dimension.

Of course it would not have the purpose to make a bigger platforms for war-games or drug-misuse communities, that is why it is useful to have the SMF-agreements with some virtuous membership-rules for boards and members on the Global-Membership-level in between.

A software get's fast an image by a specific user kind as well...

The join adventure between two or three forums is a good start, but when making that feature, I guess its no problem to bring it to a higher level as well.

Some option ideas:

Global SMF settings:
* Join Global SMF community with your board? Yes/No  (Your board will be listed in the global directory of SMF - Global member and enables the possibility for SMF-Globalmembers to visit your board and vici versa)
* Select accepted languages: select list
* Select theme of your board where it should be listed: select list
* Set permissions for Global user group: couple of permission similar to other settings

Global SMF join adventure:
Invite friendship board list back to Global SMF member board directory/or link?
Accept requested: list of request...
...
Permissions...



Kindred

See johann, now this is your problem.
We have dismissed your initial idea as unworkable, but moved on to a variation which is not oly workable, but is actually a good idea...   And yet, now you go back to harping on the initial idea.
Please do not PM, IM or Email me with support questions.  You will get better and faster responses in the support boards.  Thank you.

"Loki is not evil, although he is certainly not a force for good. Loki is... complicated."

sangham.net

Dear Kindred,

no problem, really.

Of course some things are interdependent and it might need a little to understand the whole thing. As it should be how ever a firm things, its good to thinks on 3.0 when doing the 2.0.5.

These are just ideas, nothing else. If you like them, good. If not, good as well. But don't make them depend on a uncleared cache. It make the whole system slow and the momentary computing capacity.

I guess I am the last who needs you to tell about such things. How to get the whole stuff run well and this is not by simply add another mod. The trauma has to be pulled out.

So if there is still a language trauma, just think in "english Global social network" dimensions. The other should be no problem later on, if desired. Or?

If we set ideas in relation with persons, its sometimes difficult. Then we might have a assuming of the person and miss to look at the action or idea. We do not see just idea but his, her, mine, our... idea. That might makr it difficult even to take the best things, as we regard it maybe as not mine. And what is not mine is not fine...

So simply letting go of the history of other topics, back to the topic here. If you like to change the topic starter, it is no problem. No desire to own or mark an idea with my avatar.


Kindred

holy mackeral, man - can't you ever write any response in less than a rennaissance novel?
Please do not PM, IM or Email me with support questions.  You will get better and faster responses in the support boards.  Thank you.

"Loki is not evil, although he is certainly not a force for good. Loki is... complicated."

Shambles

The more I see here, and in the other threads, the more I'm convinced these posts are being made by the prototype contextual "John Bot" I've been reading about. No, seriously.

sangham.net

You didn't mean him? Or did you, Shambles?

Maybe back to the topic, if a topic aside of John Bot is seen. Otherwise it would be more for the chatter box, I guess.
I am not sure if Kirmet would had run the show long if there had been just "seat in a box-guests" and no actor who really participate.

Of course for a good balance all is needed.


Irisado

Quote from: Johann B on February 28, 2013, 08:41:08 AM
So if there is still a language trauma, just think in "english Global social network" dimensions. The other should be no problem later on, if desired. Or?

The only language trauma is trying to interpret what you mean when you reply.  My suggestion, if you want to be taken seriously by the people who work on SMF, would be to address the questions they ask you directly using as succinct a form a language as you can.  You might find people are more receptive to what you have to say if you adopt this approach.
Soñando con una playa donde brilla el sol, un arco iris ilumina el cielo, y el mar espejea iridescentemente

sangham.net

Dear Irisado,

Sometimes serious is good to release form seriousness, sometimes serious could increase seriousness. So its more a matter of taking it easy and serious and lesser a matter of taking it serious but not easy. But when we stuck, we stuck. We would let go, if we would let go, what would be left?

Thanks for your care, I will try to be more serious but no idea how to increase it even more.
Maybe it's good if you make the topic not depend on an assuming if the starter might be serious or not. Just the topic, nothing else.


Irisado

Quote from: Johann B on March 01, 2013, 04:56:56 AM
Sometimes serious is good to release form seriousness, sometimes serious could increase seriousness. So its more a matter of taking it easy and serious and lesser a matter of taking it serious but not easy. But when we stuck, we stuck. We would let go, if we would let go, what would be left?

This is a prime example of what I'm talking about.  What you have said here doesn't make sense.

QuoteThanks for your care, I will try to be more serious but no idea how to increase it even more.
Maybe it's good if you make the topic not depend on an assuming if the starter might be serious or not. Just the topic, nothing else.

If you don't really want to see the change that you're asking for (i.e. it's not a serious or genuine proposal), why ask for it to be implemented in the first place  ????
Soñando con una playa donde brilla el sol, un arco iris ilumina el cielo, y el mar espejea iridescentemente

sangham.net

Irisado, you would not take it serious either. Or you would take it to serious. So better ticking it off as flippancy and go on.


Arantor

And still no-one understands you, even when you make it a one liner.
No good deed goes unpunished
All helpful urges should be circumvented

Irisado

Quote from: Johann B on March 01, 2013, 09:05:44 PM
Irisado, you would not take it serious either. Or you would take it to serious. So better ticking it off as flippancy and go on.

I interpret this as your not being interested in having a productive discussion about this, so if that's the case, I'm more than happy to stop.
Soñando con una playa donde brilla el sol, un arco iris ilumina el cielo, y el mar espejea iridescentemente

sangham.net

So we have cleaned the cache and can/could start again: Global SMF social network Of course only if you see any useful features hidden in all this ideas.

The objectives are different:

* Personal
* SMF Community
* SMF Product
* SMF Enduser
* SMF Boardrunner
* SMF general reputation
* SMF Markteing
* SMF Virtue/Conducts







Orangine

What cache have you cleaned? What are these 'objectives' that are not actually objectives at all?

Arantor

QuoteWhat cache have you cleaned?

In our understanding, I think. What he's saying is that we should ignore the previous and think freshly upon it.

QuoteWhat are these 'objectives' that are not actually objectives at all?

I'm still not convinced they're not just meaningless rambles.
No good deed goes unpunished
All helpful urges should be circumvented

sangham.net

Dear friends,

Quote from: Arantor on March 02, 2013, 09:46:59 AM
QuoteWhat cache have you cleaned?
In our understanding, I think. What he's saying is that we should ignore the previous and think freshly upon it.
Yes exactly. That is how things can be worked out to an end. Thanks for translation Arantor.

Quote
QuoteWhat are these 'objectives' that are not actually objectives at all?
I'm still not convinced they're not just meaningless rambles.
Cache still not cleaned. Maybe you give it a change. You would not delete any system data.

Let me know if there is a will of just go into the topic.


Arantor

QuoteYes exactly. That is how things can be worked out to an end. Thanks for translation Arantor.

So why couldn't you just have said that?

QuoteCache still not cleaned. Maybe you give it a change. You would not delete any system data.

Why do you have to make it so complicated? My cache is 'still not cleaned' because every time you come out with this random nonsense that I have to spend time making sense of.

In short: it's not cleaned because you still keep filling it up with hard to process concepts.
No good deed goes unpunished
All helpful urges should be circumvented

sangham.net

So what would a programmer do in such case?


Orangine

A programmer would hit you with $2000 bill for wasting their time with your nonsense.

sangham.net

Ohh! Of course that is also a way to save face and for sure not unusual. But what could be done in a voluntary - environment? Do you think that just saying "you are wasting their time with your nonsense" would be enough and sustainable to make a topic unreasonable and to get the neck out of the trap?

You are very welcome to participate on topic as well Orangine. Maybe you like to state your opinions in regard of it.
Thanks for your patient.




Advertisement: