Suggestion in relation to implementing the possibility of the change of name...

[jsx]

What you mean?

[Kindred]

I mean exactly what I said.

  It is not nearly as simple as you seem to think.

[jsx]

I understand what you wrote, but I wrote you what is difficult to introduce such a option?

[Kindred]

we can't just reuse the code that you point out.

[jsx]

All right, one time you think about introducing such a function, really this function is needed.

[Xarcell]

but that's the thing... you keep going on about it, which does after the third time sound like a complaint...

I think it's up to 5 times now, lol.

@rimh101 You will not see this feature in 2.0(current version) or 2.1(upcoming version). Constantly asking for it will not change anything. Arantor is stubborn and I agree with him.

SMF 2.1 has way too many problems right now(mostly inherited). So much in fact that it even kinda feels discouraging to work on it, because you bust your butt and feel like your not getting anywhere, and that equals getting burned out(IMO). I feel bad for the developers and wish I could help, but I just end up getting in the way. It makes one wonder if we should skip 2.1 and jump straight to 3.0, but then 3.0 is even further away than 2.1 and I think the SMF community needs something before the end of the year to keep it's faith in it. More features equals more time.

[Arantor]

SMF 2.1 has way too many problems right now(mostly inherited). So much in fact that it even kinda feels discouraging to work on it, because you bust your butt and feel like your not getting anywhere, and that equals getting burned out(IMO). I feel bad for the developers and wish I could help, but I just end up getting in the way. It makes one wonder if we should skip 2.1 and jump straight to 3.0, but then 3.0 is even further away than 2.1 and I think the SMF community needs something before the end of the year to keep it's faith in it. More features equals more time.

You have no idea how accurate this is.