Topic: SMF 2.1 Beta 3 Released

[finnich]

Yeayyy!!!!
Well done team proud of you>.....Thanks for the best product.

[Serena Butler]

Unfotunately it failed for me. I followed the proposed large upgrade procedure (exact like I done the beta's before):

Notice: Undefined index: db_mb4 in /www/htdocs/xxxxx/forum_smf/Sources/Load.php on line 89

Any ideas? It's kinda small Testforum and sure I have backups but like to know how to avoid this.

Thanks for your time!

cheers!

[Nibogo]

Unfotunately it failed for me. I followed the proposed large upgrade procedure (exact like I done the beta's before):

Notice: Undefined index: db_mb4 in /www/htdocs/xxxxx/forum_smf/Sources/Load.php on line 89

Any ideas? It's kinda small Testforum and sure I have backups but like to know how to avoid this.

Thanks for your time!

cheers!

Selena please do your support requests at the appropriate board: https://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?board=254.0

[Joomlamz]

Yes wait.....thank you

[Replikacep]

Subs-db-mysql.php file has a utf8 problem on db connection created in ssi.php

Row 384 Subs-db-mysql.php

$connection->set_charset("utf8");


https://github.com/SimpleMachines/SMF2.1/issues/4205

[Arantor]

Define "problem".

[Steve]

Finally, as always, this topic is not for support.

[Bloc]

Edited to remove quoted spam post, which had been deleted - Iris.

The beta3 is quite usable as it is, and beta4 is startet upon- on Github at least.

I am developing a new SMF theme for 2.1 beta3/beta4 and see no problem starting to use this version. No need to wait until RC versions - the more that use betas the quicker any issues can be dealt with and the sooner we can get to that stable RC version. I remember using 2.0 betas long before any 2.0 stable versions and there were quite a few changes in the default theme back then, from one beta to another.

[Colin]

It is perfectly fine to use the Beta version in a sandboxed personal environment, but we do discourage running any Beta version in a production environment. We certainly appreciate you testing SMF 2.1 and ultimately how you use it even in the beta stage is at your discretion.

[Sharon117]

After struggling with SMF V2.0.14, I installed this BETA version and still found the same bug...
I log in as admin and when I try to log out it gives an error... also if you log in with registered members they log into each others accounts. I tried to downgrade to previous version but seems like you can't... Been using SMF on all my previous websites and it worked great! Hope you guys will fix this soon... And also... can't install any themes on BETA...

[d3vcho();]

Please don't use this thread for support. Start a new topic in the right board, and you'll receive support there.

[makmurqq]

I have to say that I'm looking forward to 2.1 more than any other software upgrade in recent years. glad to see the progress.

Link to website removed.  Please avoid putting links to your website in your replies, otherwise you will be warned for spamming - Iris.

[Gheko]

how can i fix this error:  /home/club206/domains/club-206.ro/public_html/Sources/Subs.php
==>3311:               $path = $modSettings['attachmentUploadDir'][$modSettings['currentAttachmentUploadDir']];
3312:   

Thanks!
le. i have beta 2 from the begining .. and i cannot pas to a stable smf is a live forum...well almoust dead because of fb:)

[d3vcho();]

Finally, as always, this topic is not for support. Discussion and support for 2.1 can be found in the 2.1 support board.

[AdamExpoStand]

Congratulations

[pocttopus]

How is it going with final release of 2.1? 

[Gazmanafc]

It'll be ready when it's ready. We don't give ETAs on release dates, besides, it still needs to go through the RC phase first.

[CoreISP]

The offtopic discussion has been merged with the existing topic in Chit Chat. Thanks.

[seosefi]

It's a bit difficult to setup, but it works smoothly.

[Astrorushi]

This SMF 2.1 Beta 3 is not working properly i used this one 1 week after that i uninstalled