Text only | Text with Images

Simple Machines Community Forum

General Community => Site Comments, Issues and Concerns => Topic started by: ryanbsoftware on March 02, 2005, 12:10:23 PM

Title: 1.l33t?
Post by: ryanbsoftware on March 02, 2005, 12:10:23 PM
what is version 1.l33t?
Title: Re: 1.l33t?
Post by: Daniel D. on March 02, 2005, 12:13:51 PM
 ::) David, this is your thread... :P
Title: Re: 1.l33t?
Post by: Trekkie101 on March 02, 2005, 12:19:50 PM
QuoteSimple Machines Community Forum | Powered by SMF 1.l33t.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.    
LMAO

Is this about it being a hybrid of different code?
Title: Re: 1.l33t?
Post by: bloc on March 02, 2005, 01:03:35 PM
;D http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A787917
Title: Re: 1.l33t?
Post by: ryanbsoftware on March 02, 2005, 01:22:23 PM
so the devlopers but that their for kicks?  :-\

i've heard of the laguage of l33t i just never knew the name for it, interesting, its that what 1.1 will say? lol.  :D
Title: Re: 1.l33t?
Post by: Ben_S on March 02, 2005, 01:57:33 PM
Err no, 1.1 reads 1.1.
Title: Re: 1.l33t?
Post by: ryanbsoftware on March 02, 2005, 02:08:30 PM
Quote from: Ben_S on March 02, 2005, 01:57:33 PM
Err no, 1.1 reads 1.1.

dang!
Title: Re: 1.l33t?
Post by: Meriadoc on March 03, 2005, 02:07:05 PM
but apparently a conglomeration of 1.0.x and 1.1 reads 1.l33t :D
see, we really are running the latest stable code here, no need to worry!
Title: Re: 1.l33t?
Post by: Trekkie101 on March 03, 2005, 02:16:10 PM
Tentatively Hackproof

If you dont let people know exactly what files use what, there aint gonna be as many hack attempts if somethings uncovered. Although it would be bad to loose my board, loosing this aswell would mean that hell just froze over.
Title: Re: 1.l33t?
Post by: ryanbsoftware on March 03, 2005, 02:31:06 PM
i want mine to say 1.l33t  :'( :D
Text only | Text with Images