Member Specific Permissions...

[Grudge]

Well - I've had time to code this up so you can now issue permissions on a member by member basis. I've just got to come up with some *good* way of giving some management to this as you can only do it from users profiles. I want to just emphasise (spelling?) that this will be a MOD and not in final SMF. Some screenshots:


As you can see the UI is a bit crappy but it appears to work

EDIT: Stupid big pictures - oh well - sorry :p

[[Unknown]]

(psst... cannot is one word... .)

-[Unknown]

[Grudge]

*arrggghhhhhhhhhh*

[eFishie]

Aah, what does [unk] know?

[morph]

Aah, what does [unk] know?

Alot. (I think)

[eFishie]

Aah, what does $morph know?

[morph]

HEY! 

Yeah yeah I know..

[[Unknown]]

(pssst... "alot" is two words, "a" and "lot" sorta like "a" and "little" .)

-[Unknown]

[nil]

(pssst... "alot" is two words, "a" and "lot" sorta like "a" and "little" .)

-[Unknown]

lmao.  Thats why 's the best.  Such a great sense of humor.

(their are alot of people that can not use proper spelling or grammar)

[[Unknown]]

(pssssst... it's "there" and "a lot" .)

-[Unknown]

[eFishie]

(psssssst... he's 'doing stuff' with you .)

[nil]

(pssssst... it's "there" and "a lot" .)

-[Unknown]

(pssssssst... you missed one! )

(pssst... "alot" is two words, "a" and "lot" sorta like "a" and "little" .)

-[Unknown]

lmao.  Thats why 's the best.  Such a great sense of humor.

(their are alot of people that can not use proper spelling or grammar)

[[Unknown]]

I know, he was doing it on purpose so I decided to bother him back....

Please don't swear.

-[Unknown]

[Tyris]

but can and not are both words... so technically doesnt "can not" make gramatical sense even tho it can be written as one word? (and yes I'm aware there are probably spelling mistakes in this post )

back to topic: nice looking systemy thing... does it work pretty much 100% atm...? or buggy...?

[eFishie]

I know, he was doing it on purpose so I decided to bother him back....

Please don't swear.

-[Unknown]

Happy?

[Grudge]

back to topic: nice looking systemy thing... does it work pretty much 100% atm...? or buggy...?

I do believe buggy would probably be sufficient description. Main problem is the lack of a "review permissions" type screen. It's useless unless you can summarise all the people who have special permissions!!

[Anguz]

Grudge, how does it work then? is it a one-member group with it's permissions with a simple way to change it from the profile? does/will it let you give him an image to be shown under the name in messages and a color for the users online list too? (~_^)

[Anguz]

btw, you could probably make the permissions screen something like this

[Gobalopper]

Err, maybe with a couple more columns.

[Anguz]

Err, maybe with a couple more columns.

that was just the basic idea, to use checkboxes mainly