Footnotes v1.08 is out!

Nao 尚 · April 16, 2009, 04:58:27 PM

Quote from: damnitmike on April 16, 2009, 04:00:12 PM
Hmmmm....seems we lost some posts here after the server maintenance....

Yay... Wonderful..... -_-
SM.org also lost my 1.02 update. I had to reupload it.

mforum, I somehow missed your post! I don't know how, since it was one of the first. I've updated the screenshot to the newer tag, thanks.

QuoteNao...your fix for me did the trick.....without going back into my cpanel and going by memory, the !important! with the font size 9 worked beautifully in the css.styles.........

Yeah I had time to see this. If you didn't catch my answer: was it due to !important or the 9px thing? I used "smaller" as the size, because there's no way for me to know what theme everyone is using, and what font size is in use. Using percentages would work, too, and I would strongly recommend that. Try font-size: 90% and 80%, I'm sure one of these will be good, and it will be compatible with all font sizes. Maybe I'll revert to a percentage in a future release, so try to find the best one for you, and if I'm lazy enough, I'll use that one

damnitmike · April 16, 2009, 05:22:35 PM

Actually, I copied and pasted your code for the fix, so I don't know what did it....I was thinking the font size number did the trick because, in my experience, it forces the size specifically ?

Heck, I dunno, maybe the important bit had something to do with it also....

Anyhooo.....its all golden now...

Thanks!

Nao 尚 · April 17, 2009, 05:37:19 AM

Quote from: damnitmike on April 16, 2009, 05:22:35 PM
Actually, I copied and pasted your code for the fix, so I don't know what did it....I was thinking the font size number did the trick because, in my experience, it forces the size specifically ?

Could you just remove the "!important" bit, please?
And testing for percentage solutions would be cool, really.

damnitmike · April 17, 2009, 09:46:52 AM

Ok Nao.....more than happy to help!

I removed the !important......no problems, still looked right.

I changed the font number to a %.......60% looked perfect......

It just didn't like the word small or super (duhhhh......I forget which is was)

Nao 尚 · April 17, 2009, 10:22:17 AM

The word was "smaller"

60% then? Okay, I'll try to remember that.

damnitmike · April 17, 2009, 10:28:57 AM

It made sense and is easy to remember.... I started at 90 and worked down.

Got to 60 and said, now that makes sense.....its alittle over 1/2 the size of the regular text........

When you jump into your next mod, (hint hint) I'll be happy to test er also!

I gotta say *off topic* you tore the AEVA mod up bro!!!! That thing is sweeeet!!!

Akyhne · April 19, 2009, 09:15:41 PM

Quote from: Nao 尚 on April 15, 2009, 05:12:31 AM
Thanks
I figured it would be nice to try and get my first actual mod out (ie not something someone else created in the first place).

LOL, I was earlier out than you were, and i can barely program anything...

NB is well known in my country, so it's logical to me.

Rehash D Internet · April 21, 2009, 03:47:50 AM

Hi. Is there any way to determine the space between the text and the number of the footnote? It seems to be different every single time.. I just want the footnote tight to the number.

Nao 尚 · April 21, 2009, 04:05:31 AM

What do you mean?
Link to an example of your issue?

Rehash D Internet · April 21, 2009, 04:22:00 AM

Well, some footnotes appear like this:

[1] Example

And others like this

[2] Example

And yet others like this

[3] Example

It's really inconsistent for some reason.

Nao 尚 · April 21, 2009, 05:49:51 AM

Again: link?

Rehash D Internet · April 21, 2009, 06:31:01 AM

Quote from: Nao 尚 on April 21, 2009, 05:49:51 AM
Again: link?

http://www.surgicalaplomb.com/index.php?topic=3451.msg338835#new

You'll notice each use of the code puts the text at a different indent from the number.

Nao 尚 · April 21, 2009, 08:27:06 AM

Why didn't you say you had a custom theme in the first place?

You forgot to apply the style.css changes to your deeppink.css file....

Rehash D Internet · April 22, 2009, 12:12:28 AM

There is no "?>" in my deeppink.css. I've tried adding the code but it makes no difference to the alignment.

Nao 尚 · April 22, 2009, 05:24:36 AM

Why should there be a "?>" in deeppink? I don't see your point.
Are you trying to add PHP code to a stylesheet? lol...
Please learn how to install a mod before you attempt to actually do it. Some things have to be learnt one way and not the other way around.

Tiribulus · April 22, 2009, 09:05:33 AM

Not so fast there bucko

The Parser is saying to add the css code before ?> Don't ask me

Nao 尚 · April 22, 2009, 09:50:35 AM

("bucko"?)

That's a bug in the parser. Don't blame me for it. All my script says is "add this data at the end of the style.css file". The parser says "Find (at the end of the file)", it shouldn't add anything really. Report that bug to the mod site team if you'd like, lol.

Tiribulus · April 22, 2009, 10:02:04 AM

Quote from: Nao 尚 on April 22, 2009, 09:50:35 AM
("bucko"?)

That's a bug in the parser. Don't blame me for it. All my script says is "add this data at the end of the style.css file". The parser says "Find (at the end of the file)", it shouldn't add anything really. Report that bug to the mod site team if you'd like, lol.

You never saw happy days

I wasn't blaming you. I was only saying that this chap could be forgiven for thinking as much since the parser does say what he says.

Nao 尚 · April 23, 2009, 02:18:43 AM

Quote from: Tiribulus on April 22, 2009, 10:02:04 AM
You never saw happy days

Yes but in French only, lol. Who says bucko? The Fonze?

Tiribulus · April 23, 2009, 07:24:47 AM

Quote from: Nao 尚 on April 23, 2009, 02:18:43 AM
Quote from: Tiribulus on April 22, 2009, 10:02:04 AM
You never saw happy days
Yes but in French only, lol. Who says bucko? The Fonze?

Remember whenever Richie Cunningham was being firm with somebody (which was the joke), he'd say "now look here Bucko" lol, nevermind, I was goofin around. In French it's probably "Buckois"

News:

Footnotes v1.08 is out!