Recent posts
#11
Theme Site Themes / Re: Blue Wave
Last post by El-Gato - Today at 12:05:56 PMThank you! 
But how can I move the Info Center from the right side to the bottom?
But how can I move the Info Center from the right side to the bottom?
#12
Bug Reports / Re: SMF 2.1.6 Calendar events ...
Last post by rockyr1156 - Today at 11:58:52 AMQuote from: Kindred on Today at 07:59:08 AMCan not replicate the issue.
1- go to calendar
2- add event
3- add event name
4- add event date (set to 24-January-2026)
5- a- add link to post
b- without link to post
(if 5a, then create post as normal)
click submit
expected results: event created with date 24-January-2026
actual results: event created with date 24-January-2026
I did everything on your list; however, when I click on the date 24-January-2026 it fills the Start field with 24 Mar, 2026. This has been reported to me by several of my forum members and when I tried the same error occurred.
#13
Bug Reports / Re: 2.1.6 - Database error in ...
Last post by Volker S - Today at 11:25:24 AMI took a look at my table. There (smf_log_packages), your module 6.26 appears four times but is only installed once (your module is the gray lines). Can you make sense of that?
The time for the installed version is also correct -> 1751566773 translates to Thursday, July 3rd 2025, 20:19:33 (GMT +2)
My mistake—the normal function attachment is installed—as also available here in the forum. So AARR is definitely not installed—only the old table shows that. Then everything is correct, and if fix_packages does not work, I will have to delete the line in the table? Sorry for the back and forth.
However, I am happy to wait for your advice.
The time for the installed version is also correct -> 1751566773 translates to Thursday, July 3rd 2025, 20:19:33 (GMT +2)
My mistake—the normal function attachment is installed—as also available here in the forum. So AARR is definitely not installed—only the old table shows that. Then everything is correct, and if fix_packages does not work, I will have to delete the line in the table? Sorry for the back and forth.
However, I am happy to wait for your advice.
#14
SMF 2.1.x Support / Re: Can't install, directories...
Last post by DisketteGuy - Today at 11:09:09 AMSOLVED
Never mind, php-fpm systemd service were not meant to write into /usr directories.
Either move it somewhere that's not inside /usr
or comment out ProtectSystem=full at /usr/lib/systemd/system/php-fpm.service
Although, it is weird that MediaWiki can write into /usr using magic.
Never mind, php-fpm systemd service were not meant to write into /usr directories.
Either move it somewhere that's not inside /usr
or comment out ProtectSystem=full at /usr/lib/systemd/system/php-fpm.service
Although, it is weird that MediaWiki can write into /usr using magic.
#15
SMF 2.1.x Support / Re: What does it mean to unapp...
Last post by MegaBrutal - Today at 10:50:19 AMSo it's more like revoking approval, thanks! 
#16
SMF 2.1.x Support / Re: What does it mean to unapp...
Last post by Illori - Today at 10:48:24 AMby default all posts are "approved" by being approved they are visible to everyone that can see it. when it is unapproved it is only visible to moderators. for example if i suspected that you were a spammer and wanted to discuss your post with the team i could unapprove it and discuss it then take action in the future.
#17
SMF 2.1.x Support / What does it mean to unapprove...
Last post by MegaBrutal - Today at 10:45:00 AMI'm translating Modlog.english.php and encountered strings "Unapproved topic" ($txt['modlog_ac_unapprove_topic']), "Unapproved message" ($txt['modlog_ac_unapprove']), and maybe there are others. I assume it is about pre-moderated forums or members where or whose topics or messages need to be approved individually and there the moderator may choose to "unapprove" a post.
Now, does "unapproving" a message mean that it was previously approved and the moderator chose to revoke this approval, or was it rejected in the first place? If the latter, I think "reject" would be more meaningful in this context even in English. As for my language, I need to use different phrases for "revoked approvals" and "outright rejections", if you get what I mean.
Now, does "unapproving" a message mean that it was previously approved and the moderator chose to revoke this approval, or was it rejected in the first place? If the latter, I think "reject" would be more meaningful in this context even in English. As for my language, I need to use different phrases for "revoked approvals" and "outright rejections", if you get what I mean.
#18
Bug Reports / Re: 2.1.6 - Database error in ...
Last post by Volker S - Today at 10:21:16 AMNothing happens because AARR is present on both sides of fix_packages. On the uninstalled and installed sides.
I tried anyway to check the AARR 6.26 module on the uninstalled side and then use "Marked install selected" to move it exclusively to the installed side. Unfortunately, this did not change anything.
Edit: I set the duplicate version that was also in the installed window to uninstalled. The problem remains—I cannot uninstall the AARR 6.26 package—all files fail the test.
As long as both versions (6.26) appear in both the installed and uninstalled windows, something is wrong.
I tried anyway to check the AARR 6.26 module on the uninstalled side and then use "Marked install selected" to move it exclusively to the installed side. Unfortunately, this did not change anything.
Edit: I set the duplicate version that was also in the installed window to uninstalled. The problem remains—I cannot uninstall the AARR 6.26 package—all files fail the test.
As long as both versions (6.26) appear in both the installed and uninstalled windows, something is wrong.
Quote(ie, that AARR was installed yesterday).I only uninstalled it yesterday (didn't install it) – that came with the database restoration. That's why it says that I installed it on July 3.
#19
Modifications and Packages / Re: Optimus
Last post by Pieszyce - Today at 10:18:19 AMHi Kindred
a screemprint from what I am seeing now.
everything i changed gives now, test fails.
Link screenprint: https://forum.polenforum.nl/images/SMF-update.jpg
a screemprint from what I am seeing now.
everything i changed gives now, test fails.
Link screenprint: https://forum.polenforum.nl/images/SMF-update.jpg
#20
SMF 2.1.x Support / Re: Can't install, directories...
Last post by DisketteGuy - Today at 10:05:47 AMQuote from: Kindred on Today at 08:14:09 AM777 is generally not needed
755 for directories -- maybe 775 if that doesn't work on your host.
644 for files -- maybe 664 if that doesn't work on your host.
Well, the tarball seemed to be pre-emptively set to those permission anyway. And it still did not work.
I set it to 777 because if [an ambiguious user/group] is not authorized to read/write due to permission issue, then setting it to 777 should fix it. But it does not. Too bad for me.